Fuzzy in 3–D: Two Contrasting Paradigms
نویسندگان
چکیده
Type-2 fuzzy sets and complex fuzzy sets are both three dimensional extensions of type-1 fuzzy sets. Complex fuzzy sets come in two forms, the standard form, postulated in 2002 by Ramot et al., and the 2011 innovation of pure complex fuzzy sets, proposed by Tamir et al.. In this paper we compare and contrast both forms of complex fuzzy set with type-2 fuzzy sets, as regards their rationales, applications, definitions, and structures. In addition, pure complex fuzzy sets are compared with type-2 fuzzy sets in relation to their inferencing operations. Complex fuzzy sets and type-2 fuzzy sets differ in their roles and applications; complex fuzzy sets are pertinent to inferencing where there is seasonality, and type-2 fuzzy sets are applicable to reasoning under uncertainty. Their definitions differ also, though there is equivalence between those of a pure complex fuzzy set and a type-2 fuzzy set. Structural similarity is evident between these threedimensional sets. Complex fuzzy sets are represented by a 3–D line, and type2 fuzzy sets by a 3–D surface, but a surface is simply a generalisation of a line. This similarity is particularly apparent between pure complex fuzzy sets and type2 fuzzy sets, which are both mappings from the domain onto the unit square. However type-2 fuzzy sets were found not to be isomorphic to pure complex fuzzy sets. Greenfield, Chiclana: Fuzzy in 3–D: Two Contrasting Paradigms. APHSC 2013, 1:1 DOI 10.1007 978-3-642-31715-68 – http://www.aphsc.org/article/10001 Page 1 of 19 The mechanisms by which complex fuzzy sets model and quantify periodicity, and type-2 fuzzy sets model and quantify uncertainty are discussed. A type-2 fuzzy set can be represented as the union of its type-2 embedded set. An embedded type-2 fuzzy set is a type-2 fuzzy set in itself, whose geometrical representation is a 3-D line. Thus, geometrically an embedded type-2 fuzzy set can be seen as equivalent to a pure complex fuzzy set and therefore a type-2 fuzzy set can be represented as the union of a collection pure complex fuzzy sets, which in turn can be regarded as embedded complex fuzzy sets of a type-2 fuzzy set. This relationship is exploited to provide a complex definition of a type-2 fuzzy set. Submitted: 00/00/00. Accepted and Published: 00/00/00. Greenfield, Chiclana: Fuzzy in 3–D: Two Contrasting Paradigms. APHSC 2013, 1:1 DOI 10.1007 978-3-642-31715-68 – http://www.aphsc.org/article/10001 Page 2 of 19
منابع مشابه
A Hybrid Fuzzy Multi-criteria Decision Making Model Based on Fuzzy DEMATEL with Fuzzy Analytical Network Process and Interpretative Structural Model for Prioritizing LARG Supply Chain Practices
In recent years, taking advantage of LARG supply chain (SC) paradigm, a combination of four paradigms (clean, agile, resilience and green) has been increasingly employed. For capturing the advantages of LARG in SC, companies needed to recognize proper practices and implement them with appropriate planning and infrastructure. However, one of its deficiencies is lack of proper method in the prior...
متن کاملExploring the Symbolic/Subsymbolic Continuum: A Case Study of RAAM
It is di cult to clearly de ne the symbolic and subsymbolic paradigms; each is usually described by its tendencies rather than any one de nitive property. Symbolic processing is generally characterized by hard-coded, explicit rules operating on discrete, static tokens, while subsymbolic processing is associated with learned, fuzzy constraints a ecting continuous, distributed representations. In...
متن کاملNeuro-Fuzzy Paradigms for Intelligent Energy Management
Intelligent energy management has become one of the major research fields in electrical engineering. It constitutes an important tool for efficient planning and operation of power systems and its significance has been intensifying particularly, because of the recent movement towards open energy markets and the need to assure high standards on reliability. Hybrid neuro-fuzzy paradigms have recen...
متن کاملUnification of neural and wavelet networks and fuzzy systems
This paper analyzes several commonly used soft computing paradigms (neural and wavelet networks and fuzzy systems, Bayesian classifiers, fuzzy partitions, etc.) and tries to outline similarities and differences among each other. These are exploited to produce the weighted radial basis functions paradigm which may act as a neuro-fuzzy unification paradigm. Training rules (both supervised and uns...
متن کاملTowards a Proof Theory for Basic Logic
Proof systems based on rules with the property that all formulas contained in the assumptions are contained as subformulas in the conclusion as well, are particularly suitable for automated proof search. Systems of this kind were found for several well-known fuzzy logics. However, for BL (Basic Logic), the logic of continuous t-norms and their residua, the situation is less satisfactory. We con...
متن کامل